Urban development is often heralded as a sign of progress, with city corridors being transformed into hubs of economic activity, transportation, and infrastructure enhancement. However, while such projects bring modernization, they also pose significant challenges for the urban poor, who are often displaced or marginalized in the process.
City corridors, major roads, transit routes, and commercial arteries—are developed to enhance connectivity and economic vibrancy. Governments and private developers invest in these corridors to attract businesses, improve public transportation, and create urban aesthetics that appeal to investors and tourists. The underlying aim is to foster economic growth, reduce congestion, and improve the overall quality of life for city dwellers.
For example, the development of the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor in India aims to boost industrial growth and create job opportunities, but it has also led to displacement of local communities. Similarly, the expansion of Nairobi’s Thika Superhighway in Kenya improved transport efficiency but resulted in the loss of homes and businesses for many informal settlers.
One of the biggest concerns associated with city corridor development is the displacement of low-income communities. As real estate values rise due to improved infrastructure, property owners often increase rents, forcing poorer residents and small business owners to relocate. This phenomenon, known as gentrification, results in the loss of affordable housing and diminishes economic opportunities for those who rely on low-cost commercial spaces.
Moreover, slum dwellers and informal settlements along proposed development corridors often face eviction without adequate compensation or resettlement options. In many cases, relocation programs push them to the peripheries of the city, away from their workplaces and support systems, exacerbating their economic struggles. A case in point is the development of Brazil’s São Paulo Rodoanel beltway, where thousands of low-income residents were displaced with minimal compensation, disrupting their livelihoods.
While city corridor projects create jobs during construction and in commercial sectors post-development, these opportunities are not always accessible to the poor. Many of the jobs require technical skills or qualifications that low-income residents may lack. Additionally, the businesses that replace informal economies in redeveloped corridors often cater to middle- and upper-income groups, further marginalizing the poor.
For instance, in Manila, Philippines, the redevelopment of key transport corridors has driven small informal vendors out of business as large commercial enterprises dominate the newly developed spaces. Without access to alternative livelihood opportunities, many displaced individuals struggle to regain financial stability.
Improved corridors often bring better transportation systems, healthcare facilities, and educational institutions. However, if the cost of accessing these services increases, they remain out of reach for low-income groups. The introduction of high-end infrastructure often leads to an increase in the cost of living, making it difficult for the poor to benefit from the very developments meant to enhance urban life.
For example, in Johannesburg, South Africa, the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system improved public transport, but the fare hikes made it unaffordable for many low-income workers who relied on informal and cheaper transport options.
To mitigate the negative impacts of city corridor development on the poor, governments and urban planners must adopt inclusive policies: Affordable Housing Initiatives: Implementing rent control measures, increasing the supply of low-cost housing, and ensuring relocation plans include adequate housing provisions.
Inclusive Economic Growth: Encouraging mixed-income developments, providing financial support for small businesses, and ensuring job creation programs are accessible to lower-income groups. Community Participation: Engaging local communities in the planning process to ensure their needs and concerns are addressed before redevelopment begins. Social Safety Nets: Establishing welfare programs and legal frameworks that protect the rights of informal settlers and small business owners.
To conclude, City corridor development is essential for urban progress, but it should not come at the expense of the poor. Inclusive planning and policies can help ensure that modernization efforts benefit all city residents, rather than widening the gap between the wealthy and the underprivileged. Sustainable development should be the goal, where economic growth coexists with social equity and justice.
The post City Corridor Development and The Poor appeared first on Capital Newspaper.
